It's queer (in the old-fangled sense of the word, meaning odd, strange, weird, freaky) that LGBTQ rag Xtra would post a laudatory account of an evening of Israeli-Palestinian gay revelry in Tel Aviv, while continuing with all the sturm und drang about Queers Against Israeli Apartheid being the victims of "censorship".
I know I may be way off base by pointing this out, but if Israel really did have a state policy of apartheid, would Jewish gays and Arab gays be allowed to gather in the same place at the same time? Wouldn't there be loads of arrests by a state bound and determined to keep the two peoples apart? And is the fact that they weren't--that they aren't--prohibited from mingling and having sex with each other a clear demonstrate that there is no "Israeli apartheid"; that the whole idea is a pile of dog's mess; that the facts on the ground put a lie to the Big Lie, the one being put forward by those heavily invested in seeing Israel destroyed?
Or am I being far too rational about something that, after all, is the very definition of deranged (i.e. Homos for Hamas, Queers 4 Sharia, Hamasochism, Hamasexuals, etc.)?
It's a leftist disease. Blind in one eye, can't see out of the other. As well they can think and speak two opposing thoughts with out having to think about how opposite the ideas are. i.e. Bush is a moron, Bush was complicit in engineering the whole WTC collapse on 9/11.
ReplyDeleteYou would think that, at some stage, the cognitive dissonance would become too much for them. But I'm pretty sure the tinfoil beanies act as a lightning rod and redirect the c.d. away from the brain.
ReplyDelete