The Tribunal made clear it did not have to find that the applicant was discriminated against [in fact, it found that no discrimination had occurred] in order to award damages. It was sufficient that the applicant genuinely believed the respondents were infringing his Code rights and that he had based a complaint that was not investigated (and that ultimately led to his termination) on those beliefs.You see, it's kind of like believing in Tinker Bell--and in the sort of gender fluidity which allows individuals to decide which gender they are, and therefore which bathroom (chicks' or dudes') they'd prefer to patronize. That is, if you believe it to be so, then it is so (even if it, plainly, it isn't).
Friday, August 16, 2013
How the "Human Rights" Racket Works in Ontario: You Can Cash In For Thinking/Feeling You've Been the Victim of Discrimination, Even If It's All in Your Head
Another "brilliant" ruling from our provincial "human rights" kangaroos:
No comments:
Post a Comment