Wednesday, January 22, 2014

J. Kay's Bizarre Word Choice Strikes Again

The fellow who said Sharon's Gaza disengagement was a "masterstroke" today calls Stephen Harper's "zeal" for Israel "manic." The definition of manic is:
  1. 1.
    showing wild and apparently deranged excitement and energy.
    "his manic enthusiasm"
    synonyms:mad, insane, deranged, demented, maniacal, lunatic, wild, crazed, demonic, hysterical, raving, unhinged, unbalanced; More
    informalcrazy;
    vulgar slangbatshit
    "a manic grin"
    antonyms:sane
Harper's unwavering support for Israel is anything but "manic."  Alas, it's Kay's characterization that is batshit insane.

Update: In this tweet, Kay jokes about being "miffed" at being left out of Harper's official delegation. I say "jokes" because knowing how Kay feels about Israel--or rather, how he doesn't feel much of anything for it--I'm pretty sure he's pleased that he didn't have to go.

Update: A non-batshit insane assessment--call it the anti-Kay take--of Harper and his Knesset speech appears on the Commentary site:
Prime Minister Harper’s speech delivered before the Knesset on Monday was a case in point. Rightly, Harper spoke of Israel’s accomplishments, defending unequivocally its right to exist as a Jewish state and denouncing in no uncertain terms the new anti-Semitism that masquerades as anti-Zionism–or as Harper put it, “the old hatred has been translated into more sophisticated language for use in polite society. People who would never say they hate and blame the Jews for their own failings or the problems of the world, instead declare their hatred of Israel and blame the only Jewish state for the problems of the Middle East.” 
Ironically, when Prime Minister Harper came to rebutting the apartheid charge leveled against Israel, two of the Arab Knesset members present began to loudly interrupt him, before then promptly storming out–their very position in the Knesset, of course, serving to refute the accusation that they apparently felt so strongly about insisting upon.
This sense of obligation to speak out against such lies and bigotry clearly stems from the prime minister’s wider worldview. Harper declared unapologetically that we live in a world where “moral relativism runs rampant” and that “in the garden of such moral relativism, the seeds of much more sinister notions can be easily planted.” For, as Harper noted, “Those who, often begin by hating the Jews…history shows us, end up hating anyone who is not them.” 
Indeed, the most important aspect of Harper’s speech was the explanation he gave for why Canada would stand by Israel. Having begun by stating plainly, “Canada supports Israel because it is right to do so,” Prime Minister Harper went on to explain that “Israel is the only country in the Middle East, which has long anchored itself in the ideals of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.” 
Crucially, he observed that, “These are not mere notions. They are the things that, over time and against all odds, have proven to be the only ground in which human rights, political stability, and economic prosperity, may flourish. These values are not proprietary; they do not belong to one nation or one people. Nor are they a finite resource; on the contrary, the wider they are spread, the stronger they grow. Likewise, when they are threatened anywhere, they are threatened everywhere.”
Nothing "manic" about that.

Update: I posted this comment following the Kay screed:
I don't think people should panic,
But J. Kay thinks that Harper is "manic."
That kind of hysteria
Is sweeping the area--
But it's Kay's, whose disdain is titanic.

No comments:

Post a Comment