I want to assure Canadians that there are mechanisms in the law today that allow authorities to monitor an individual even though a formal sentence may have expired.
Mechanisms, Vic? Really? What kind of mechanisms can keep a Canadian citizen from logging on to the 'net and plotting jihad? And even if there were such mechanisms, wouldn't they be so intrusive and draconian that they'd impinge on other Canadians' civil liberties?
Sorry, Vic, but I can't say that I'm terribly reassured by your reassurances. (Love the 'stache, though.)
Steynamite! Steynamite! See you there on the morrow. Firmly Right, shines a light. Our belly laughs are Barb's sorrow. Dare to speak out and you're dubbed a lout, Dubbed a lout and a "hater." Steynamite! Steynamite! Can't wait to be a spectator.
DOHA – As fury continued over the visit of Egypt’s Mufti to Al-Quds (occupied Jerusalem), prominent scholar Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi denounced the visit as haram, unlawful, for normalizing ties with Israel and its military occupation of the Muslim holy city.
“I did not expect such an eminent person like Sheikh Gomaa to go against this consensus and visit Jerusalem and offer prayers in the Al-Aqsa mosque,” Qaradawi, president of the International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS), said in a statement published on his website on Friday, April 20.
“There is a mutual agreement among Muslims and Christians that visiting Al-Quds shall remain prohibited as long as Israel continues to occupy it by force.”
The Czech Republic has finished 57th in the 2011 Corruption Perception Index, alongside Namibia and Saudi Arabia, according to Transparency International. This ignoble ranking gave tour-operators a bright idea: for just 20 euros, you can take a “Corrupt Tour” of two to three hours, to ride around the city to see Prague’s corruption hot-spots.
A tour guide points out the locations around the capital associated with illicit dealings. "Enjoy the best of the worst" is the tour operator's motto.
The programming director of Hot Docs gushes over one of the works in her film series.
BTW, you might think that "lawmakers" in Gaza=hip 'n' happening genocidal jihadis Hamas, since they've been in charge of the joint for years now. Not so. It's actually a look at those awful Zionist occupiers--the scoundrels!--who dared to make law for Arabs in the "occupied territories."
So a victory, certainly -- but still only two cheers for Denmark’s legal system. First, as has been the case throughout this saga, the acquittal – like the previous acquittal and conviction – turned merely on the narrow question of whether the remarks by Hedegaard which were in contention had been made in a private forum. The Supreme Court decided that he had had ‘no intention of disseminating his remarks to a wider audience’, and that therefore no offence had been committed.
The crux of the issue, whether someone is entitled to speak in public in Denmark about child abuse and violence towards women in Muslim culture, remains therefore very much an open question.
