Dimant said that he recommended safeguards to prevent the office from being dominated by an anti-Christian, anti-Israel or anti-Western agenda.
“I would certainly caution the government that the Office of Religious Freedom be restricted in terms of its geopolitical mandate to countries that do not uphold democracy; for example, states that do not have free elections, a free press or an independent judiciary,” otherwise, he warned, “It could soon become an office dealing solely with Palestinian complaints, and completely sidelining issues such as the suffering of Christians in Pakistan, or of Hindus, Buddhists and Bahá’ís under Muslim regimes. We know that today there are burnings of churches and the murder and rape of Christians, which the world is ignoring. We have to concentrate on these all-too-real religious injustices.”...
Cabinet Minister Joe Oliver, on the other hand, thinks it's a grand idea:
Canada has been a leader on the world stage, taking a strong, principled stance against hate and discrimination. By establishing an Office of Religious Freedom our Conservative government is taking an important step to advance the goal that the liberties we enjoy as Canadians are enjoyed by everyone.I dunno. I'd be much happier if the Tories were more concerned about the grievous harm being done to our liberties by the "human rights" industry right here in Canada. Never mind Pakistan, Mr. Oliver; what about taking a strong, principled stance against, say, Barbara Hall? Speaking of whom, back in the day, some smartypants politicians thought "human rights" commissions/commissioners were a swell idea, too. Should serve as a cautionary tale for the Tories and their Tikkun Olam Office, no?
No comments:
Post a Comment