Globe and Mail Readers Aren't Buying CAIR-CAN Founder Sheema Khan's Flimflammery

Yesterday I posted Sheema's latest feat of Cirque de So Lame smoke-blowing. Turning to the "comments" today, I'm heartened to find that most readers can see right through it. Here, for example, are the thoughts of someone named HJK (who, like me, is prone is typos because his/her thoughts are apparently fleeter than his/her fingers):

Nonsensical apologetics. The dichotomy is not between Rousseau and Locke. Islamists reject both. The divide is between Muhamed and submission ("Islam") and the rationalism and secularism of the West. The approaches are completely different.
We believe that men are free to determine our own laws and legirtimacy resides in consent or a social contract and Islam believes that men must submit to the rule and laws of God ie sharia and legitimacy resides in the Koran and hadith: rule by man and the freedom of men is blasphemy.
No orthodox Muslim would disagree with this, at least not today.
Taqqiya much, Sheema?

Why, yes; yes she does.