Sunday, April 25, 2010

Tea and a Lack of Sympathy

This is what passes for humour/incisive commentary in the New York Times--the "clever" gas-baggery of Thomas L. Friedman (my bolds):
I’ve been trying to understand the Tea Party Movement. Sounds like a lot of angry people who want to get the government out of their lives and cut both taxes and the deficit. Nothing wrong with that — although one does wonder where they were in the Bush years. Never mind. I’m sure like all such protest movements the Tea Partiers will get their 10 to 20 percent of the vote. But should the Tea Partiers actually aspire to break out of that range, attract lots of young people and become something more than just entertainment for Fox News, I have a suggestion:
Become the Green Tea Party.
I’d be happy to design the T-shirt logo and write the manifesto. The logo is easy. It would show young Americans throwing barrels of oil imported from Venezuela and Saudi Arabia into Boston Harbor.
The manifesto is easy, too: “We, the Green Tea Party, believe that the most effective way to advance America’s national security and economic vitality would be to impose a $10 “Patriot Fee” on every barrel of imported oil, with all proceeds going to pay down our national debt.”...
Where were they during the Bush years? Er, does Tom not "get" the Tea Party shtick at all? It's a revolt against Barack H. Obama's Big Government agenda and his kiting the national debt into the stratosphere. Where were they pre-BHO? Living their lives. Minding their own beeswax. Not paying a whole lot of attention to Washington hijinks because--and I believe this is key--Bush did not have a Big Government agenda and was not kiting the national debt into the stratosphere.

It ain't exactly rocket science, Flat Tom.

No comments: