Thursday, March 18, 2010

Why Did Fatah Blow a Gasket?

Last week I suggested that one of the reasons why Tarek Fatah went off the rails following a debate between Daniel Pipes and Wafa Sultan held at a Toronto synagogue (he later wrote up his version of events for the National Post) was because he was furious that Sultan had aired Islam's dirty linen, so to speak, to a Jewish crowd. No less an authority than Andrew Bostom confirms my suspicion. He writes:

Last week, the National Post of Canada published an editorial and subsequent comments (see comments section, 7:20 PM) by Tarek Fatah — self-proclaimed “hardened secular Muslim” and much-ballyhooed Muslim moderate — addressing Canada’s Jews and the Jewish community at large. Nearly 850 years after al-Maghribi, Fatah’s defamatory screeds abandon any façade of philosophical debate in his transparent effort to silence discussion of Islam by modern Jews.

The pretense for Fatah’s diatribe was an appearance by intrepid Muslim freethinker Wafa Sultan at a Toronto synagogue. Canadian journalist Joanne Hill, who attended (and recorded) the event, wrote an assiduously documented reply to Fatah at the National Post exploding his mendacious claims about Sultan’s alleged “intent.” As I will demonstrate, Fatah’s remarks ignore (in order to bowdlerize) what Islam’s foundational texts state plainly about the Muslim prophet Muhammad’s behaviors towards his child bride Aisha and the Jews of Medina and Khaybar. Fatah’s rant then maliciously castigates Wafa Sultan’s Jewish audience — consistent with Islamic law (Sharia) precepts regarding “blasphemy” that the “hardened secularist” Fatah claims to reject — for daring to have such an uncensored, “blasphemous” discussion of Islam’s prophet...

3 comments:

Tigger said...

An authority on what? Pretentious diction?

scaramouche said...

An auhtority on Islam and Islamic Jew-hate: http://spme.net/cgi-bin/articles.cgi?ID=3669

FreedomofExpression said...

scaramouche,

Bostom is right. The "sahih" hadiths, and Sira indicate that Muhammad "consummated" his marriage to Aisha when she was 9. They also indicate that Muhammad raped Safiya after having her husband Kinana tortured and executed at the invasion of Khaybar.

Tigger can verify for this himself by checking any of several free online hadith collections, starting with Bukhari and Muslim. (Note: Ayesha may be spelled Aisha, Khaybar may be spelled Khaibar, and don't forget to include "consummated" in the search terms).

I therefore hope that Tigger will check those sources. I look forward to his reply, in which he tells us what he found regarding Ayesha's age at the "consummation," and the context of Muhammad's "consummation" of his "marriage" to Safiya.