Currently, the OIC is engaged in pressuring the UN to adopt “global blasphemy laws”.
"Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary-general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), said the international community should ‘come out of hiding from behind the excuse of freedom of expression’, a reference to Western arguments against a universal blasphemy law that the OIC has sought for over a decade."
So the question which naturally arises is on what, exactly, do Baroness Warsi and her British government colleagues intend to “cooperate” with the OIC? What “mutual goals” does the UK government think it has with an organization which seeks to limit universal human rights, curb freedom of expression, and establish its headquarters in the capital city of a UN member sovereign country?What "mutual goals"? Well, one side appears to have an inordinate desire to want to submit while the other side is keen to make it do so.
A win-win situation (for sharia), no?
No comments:
Post a Comment