Perplexingly, a federal court has ruled that, yes, state censorship as adjudicated by a Canadian kangaroo "human rights" court is constitutional but that, no, compelling the pre-guilty to fork over moolah to the aggrieved is not constitutionally kosher.
Okay, now I'm really confused.
Pundita weighs in on the ruling, while a certain reputed head-"human-rights"-commissar-in-waiting (who, like singer Alanis, doesn't understand the meaning of "ironic") gloats about the decree.
No comments:
Post a Comment