CBS asks whether Romney "can make boring sexy." Which I think is exactly the wrong thing to ask. The question is not whether "boring" can be "sexy"? The question is: would you rather have good, steady-as-she-goes leadership (as we have here in Canada with "boring," decidedly un-sexy, un-charismatic Stephen Harper), or whether you'd prefer to have a "cool," sexy, charisma-laden guy, who doesn't have a clue, and who has rocketed your debt into the stratosphere, at the helm?
Post a Comment